Answer:
C. They wanted more economic opportunity
B. they were fleeing from religious persecution
Explanation:
Fleeing crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes, and famine, many came to the U. S. because it was perceived as the land of economic opportunity. Others came seeking personal freedom or relief from political and religious persecution.
More people were needed to plant and pick cotton so plantation owners used slaves to fill these positions.
Explanation:
The invention of the "cotton gin by Eli" Whitney resulted in tremendous production in America and other industrial estates. However, it was associated with another far-fetched issue along-side.
Before the invention of the cotton gin, there was general slack in demand of slaves. The coming of cotton gin meant the humongous need for raw cotton since the machine can process the raw cotton at a faster pace than any other machines available contemporarily.
This rapid need for raw cotton was substituted by employing slaves in the cotton field for their production and collection. This caused an increased need for slave once again.
Answer:
There were not "branches" of government in the modern sense with the judiciary separated from the legislature and the executive. But Ammianus is not correct that the Senate had "all" the power either. The Senate appointed the Consuls each year (the executives, who effectively took the place of kings) and pretty much all the other officials. Senate resolutions (consults) had virtually the force of law. The Senate itself could act as a judiciary over its own members, particularly in cases of treason and such, and the officials they appointed had judicial as well as executive powers in their respective jurisdictions.
But there were also other, broader assemblies, of the army, the citizens, and the plebs (the membership of which would have overlapped a lot), and each of those had genuine powers. Formal written laws (leges) had to be voted in by the citizen assembly - they couldn't be simply decreed by the senate, and they had more weight than senate consults. Perhaps most importantly, the tribunes of the plebs had veto power over the acts of any official, which was a protection of the rights of common citizens against abuse by patricians.
The whole thing had begun with revolt against the abuses of corrupt kings. The senate had probably been a council of nobles advising the kings before that. With the kings gone, the senate took control, and the appointment of consuls was a way to have someone fill the roles kings had played like leading the army. Over the first couple of centuries of the republic, there was great civil strife between patricians (nobles in the senate) and plebeians (commoners), particularly over burdens of military service and taxation. The outcome of it was the growth of the plebeian assembly's powers and the tribunes, and the creation of a system that would admit leading plebeians as well as patricians to the senate's ranks through public service. So it all evolved in response to the demands of the time.<u>(Answer not mine)</u>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
In the years leading up to the War of 1812, some Americans thought that Britain was supporting Native American Indian tribes in the West to make them their allies in a possible and future war against the United States
in the years leading up to the War of 1812.
The War of 1812 started in June 1812 and ended in February 1815. The reason? Issues that could not be resolved after signing the Treaty of Paris that ended the Revolutionary War of Independence. The most notable problems that led to the War of 1812 were restrictions on trade and the impressment of United States sailors by British ships.
The war ended when both nations signed the Treaty of Ghent, in Belgium, after another round of pain and destruction for both nations.
A "cardinality" is any situation where one entity occurrence does not demand a counterpart entity occurrence in a certain relationship.
<h3>What exactly is an entity's cardinality?</h3>
The term "cardinality" refers to the maximum number of relationships that can exist between instances of one entity and instances of another. The lowest number of times an instance in one entity can be connected to an instance in a related entity is known as ordinality, on the other hand.
When anything is counted, the number that results is referred to as its cardinality. As a result, a set's cardinality is equal to the number of its elements. For instance, the set 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 has a higher cardinality of five than the set 1, 2, 3, which has a cardinality of three.
Learn more about cardinality: brainly.com/question/19865374
#SPJ4
