The correct answer is A) a higher chance of reelection.
A potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
A correct and useful method of decision-making is CBA or better known as cost-benefit analysis. This method is very simple. You compare your advantages to the disadvantages of the decision. You collect the information at hand and then proceed to make the best decision. In 1840, Julies Dupuit who was an Engineer from France started to use this method successfully. That is why is correct to say that a potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
I think the appropriate response is no. It was misguided and shortsighted.Both Britain and France were less needy financially on exchange with the US than Jefferson envisioned, however then financial matters never was his solid suit.
The War of 1812 was more to do with the possibility that Britain, its assets secured in the long haul battle against Napoleon, would be not able make any successful guard of Canada which could in this manner effectively be conquered.However, Britain had since a long time ago settled maritime amazingness over France and was along these lines ready to utilize its naval force to disable the US economy and power Madison into an arranged peace.
All of Korea would have been communist and much of what you see today with North Korea would probably have been the state of all Korea had the North won.
It also would have spread communism to a much farther degree and the U.S. would not have South Korea as an ally.
Answer:
Princes
Explanation:
In the book of Daniel it says Daniel was one of the princes
Answer:
Much of the time Florida is affected by a Maritime Tropical air mass, originating over the relatively warm waters of the Atlantic basin. Sometimes Continental Polar air masses move across for brief periods during the cold season, originating from Canada.
Explanation:
