Created a dividing line at latitude 36° 30'
<em>The Missouri Compromise was a law that was passed to admit Main as a free State of the United States at the same time Missouri was considered a slave state. It was needed so a balance was maintained between pro-slavery states and free states. As a part of it, a parallel was drawn on 36 30’ which prohibited slavery north of the parallel, excluding Missouri.</em>
No territory gained from Mexico should become a slave state.
<em>The Wilmot Proviso was a proposal of an law that aimed to prohibit slavery in all territory that was acquired from Mexico following the Mexican-American War. Although it wasn’t successful the debate it sparkled lasted for some years.</em>
Divided the Nebraska territory into two parts
<em>The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an Act that divided the Nebraska Territory into two parts: Nebraska and Kansas. But the problem was that the Act violated the Missouri Compromise since both territories should not be allowed to have slaves because of its location north of 36, 30’N. With that, they let the population decide if the states should be slave free or not, which brought up a series of conflicts.</em>
4. The Crittenden Compromise
Proposed six amendments to the Constitution
<em>The Crittenden Compromise was a proposal that aimed to express the right to have slaves on the US Constitution, this way it would be unconstitutional to ban slavery in the future. It consisted of six constitutional amendments. It was introduced in 1860 and it had popularity between Southern members of Senate but president Abraham Lincoln opposed the compromise and both of the House of Representatives and the Senate rejected it.</em>
<em />
True
Because the sultan’s alliance with the kaiser had gone horribly wrong. British forces held the capital Istanbul; most of the territories had fallen and Greek troops were ravaging the west of Turkey
It's interesting that you posted your question in the history section of Brainly. It qualifies in the category of "Big History," as some have termed it. That term was coined by the scholar David Christian, whom I met once at a conference where he was a presenter. His idea was that we look at "history" not just as what has happened in the recorded records of human beings, but look back at all that has occurred in the history of the universe. So the "Big History" concept incorporates the story of evolution into its account of things.
As far as your specific question, a key indicator of primates' adaptability is that you see primates living in all sorts of different regions on the planet. Snow monkeys live in cold regions of Japan where snow covers the ground many months of the year. Howler monkeys live in the tropical rainforests of Brazil. And there are other primates of all sorts in all sorts of climates and conditions. That shows the adaptability of primates to survive and thrive in various circumstances.
If i’m not mistaken around 10-15%
