true or false that many modern rights result from.supreme court interpretations of the u.s. constitution brainly

for states to pass a law that also happens to restrict religious practices, the law must have what type of aim or purpose?

Elza [17]

For states to pass a law that also happens to restrict religious practices, the law must have Nonpartisan.

Religion is commonly described as a social-cultural device of unique behaviors and practices, morals, ideals, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or agencies, that typically relate humanity to supernatural, transcendental, and religious factors;[1] but, there may be no scholarly consensus over what exactly constitutes a faith. One-of-a-kind religions can also or might not contain numerous elements ranging from the divine,[4] sacred things,[5] religion,[6] a supernatural being or supernatural beings[7] or "a few kind of ultimacy and transcendence to be able to provide norms and power for the rest of life".[8] religious practices might also consist of rituals, sermons, commemoration or veneration (of deities and/or saints), sacrifices, festivals, feasts, trances, initiations, funerary offerings, matrimonial services, meditation, prayer, music, artwork, dance, public carrier, or other components of human culture.

Learn more about religious here

brainly.com/question/681337

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

A federal statute prohibits discrimination based on age for all persons between the ages of 50 and 70 in matters relating to emp

finlep [7]

Answer:

A Federal Statute and a State Constitutional Provision

The judge is likely to prevail in this case.

Explanation:

In any matter where the federal statute prohibiting age discrimination conflicts with a state constitutional provision, the U.S. Constitution or the federal statute will prevail. This means that based on this conflict, the state constitutional provision will be declared unconstitutional and unenforceable. The reason is that federal statutes or the U.S. Constitution takes priority over all other laws. Therefore, the judge will prevail in the lawsuit and prevent the state governor from replacing him.

6 0

3 years ago

New Jersey State Police intercept a truck load of marijuana during a truck enforcement detail. The truck operator, Bill Smith is

Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

probative value

Explanation:

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides legal protection against search and seizure without good reason and without a search and seizure warrant. As we can see from the question above, Mick Stoner was charged with marijuana, which was taken from a legal dispensary in Denver, seized without a search warrant, so Mick Stoner's defense attorney disputes the evidential value of the evidence, claiming that the truck's initial search violated the Fourth Amendment.

To dispute the probative value of the evidence means that the evidence gathered, in this case, is not guaranteed, by itself, to support a condemnatory sentence, thus requiring the repetition in court of some of the evidence produced.

3 0

3 years ago

does anyone have PLATO Course Principles of Law, Public Safety, Corrections, and Security, Semester A i need help on the third s

Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

Whats your question?

Explanation:

3 0

4 years ago

do you think juveniles should be tried in adult courts? why or why not? what effects are there from trying juveniles in adult co

erik [133]

I think they should not since they have less developed brains and are more likely to get peer pressured into dangerous and unlawful stuff

8 0

3 years ago