Answer:
Fisher sued the University and argued that the use of race as a consideration in the admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court held that the University's admissions process was constitutional, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed.
Answer:
- Talking about the conversation with a compliance officer of his firm
- Accept unsolicited trades from costumers in the company's stock
Explanation:
The agent listened to another company's employee talking on the phone about confidential information, that is, private information that the agent should not be listening to, but he has heard and can use it to his company's advantage. Since no one knows that the agent has this information, he can talk about the conversation he has heard with a compliance officer at his company, and he can accept unsolicited dealings from customers on the company's stock.
Answer:
Opening statements.
Explanation:
<u>Opening statements</u>, like the name suggests, <u>are the starting statements that narrate the events of the case and what's involved</u>. The prosecutor and the defense team will both present their opening statements, though the defense team is not normally required to do so.
During a trial, these opening statements by both parties will provide the jury and the others present in court the outline of the major events, objectives of their teams in the case. This will provide them the time to present the evidence, the witnesses t be called, and the objectives of the parties in each trying to prove their case.
Thus, the correct answer is opening statements.
