1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lorico [155]
2 years ago
10

Yall please help me!!I need to turn this is asap like very soon​

Law
1 answer:
arlik [135]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I think your right

You might be interested in
Why is living on credit both dangerous to you personally and dangerous to the country?​
worty [1.4K]
Honestly it’s not dangerous to live on credit unless you DON’T PAY YOUR BILLS because with cash you have a higher chance of your money being lost or stolen, and with debit you can only pay exactly what you have in your account penny for penny, but with credit you can over spend a little on Thursday if your pay check comes tomorrow.

Please mark brainliest
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

7 0
3 years ago
Describe the process of the selection of federal judges
viva [34]

Answer:

Federal judges are judges who serve in a federal court. The term refers both to the Article III federal judges and to Article I federal judges, who serve as magistrate and bankruptcy judges, and in other Article III tribunals.

Federal judges are nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. The various steps to the process is given below:

  1. The president nominates an candidate for a judicial seat.
  2. The candidate fills out a questionnaire which is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  3. The <em>Senate Judiciary Committee </em>holds a hearing with the candidate, interviewing he or her about things like their judicial philosophy, past rulings or opinions, and ideas about certain areas of Law;
  • As part of this process, the committee sends a blue slip to senators from the home state in which the judicial election was received, allowing them to indicate whether or not they approve of the candidate

     4. After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to approve or return the candidate;

  • If approved, the candidate is voted on by the full Senate.
  • If the Committee votes to return the candidate to the president, the president has the opportunity to re-nominate the individual.

     5. The Senate holds a vote on the candidate.

  • If the Senate confirms the nomination, the nominee receives a commission to serve a lifelong position as a Federal Judge.
  • If the Senate does not confirm the nomination, that candidate does not become a judge.

Cheers!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Michael, a 25-year-old man, has committed serious felonies such as arson, assault, and battery. An analysis of his personality s
Andreyy89

Answer:

Although Michael broke the law from Negative Traits, Micheal is still responsible for his actions, he knows from right from wrong. Therfore charges should stand.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
-- In the past, nonmanagerial employees were viewed as employees who
umka21 [38]

Answer D

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In 100 or more words, tell of the Supreme Court's responsibility in interpreting the Constitution -- in other words, why does th
    5·1 answer
  • Jocelyn smith was injured by a local driver in a car accident. The other driver was texting and driving. After talking with a la
    10·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • •What is prisoner reentry?<br> •What are current issues and trends in parole and prisoner reentry?
    13·1 answer
  • Pls only answer if you feel like u know the answer
    5·1 answer
  • Explain the role of three state institutions that deal with human rights violation​
    10·1 answer
  • Q1.Give an example of a situation when a person might be under the impression of doing a good deed whereas he will be liable for
    13·1 answer
  • When are attorneys hired to negotiate?
    9·1 answer
  • I need Help with This
    11·1 answer
  • Think about someone who has been a positive leader in your life. It can be someone you know personally, or someone you've learne
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!