Tort law is generally based on what?

1 answer:

3 0

A tort, in common law jurisdiction, is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits a tortious act. It can include the intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, financial losses, injuries, invasion of privacy and many other things.

i googled “tort law is generally based on what?” and this is all that came up so idk if that helps or if you still need help with that

You might be interested in

Andrew wants to become a certified forensic pathologist. What is MOST likely to be true about his path to achieve this goal?

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

I would say C but if I'm wrong I'm sorry

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The bread soaks up the juices and flavours .

stich3 [128]

Good to know

Plz give brainliest

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is NOT true under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act? a. An intended recipient of an e-mail has th

IgorC [24]

Answer:

C. Internet Service Providers are not prohibited from disclosing the content of email messages to 3rd parties

Explanation:

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) is a law. It prohibits tapping or capturing communication over wires. There are other state laws that cover legalities about wiretapping.

Consent is required to capture electronic communication. In some states dual consent is required while in others single consent is sufficient.

Dual consent means both of the communicating parties must agree, while single consent means that one one party should agree. Electronic Communication Act was an amendment to the Title Third of Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (1968).

7 0

3 years ago

Each state has its own constitution, separate from the United States Constitution. What do you think States would include in the

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

All the We the People stuff. A Declaration of rights. How their judicial systems will work. Education, taxation. While the US Constitution describes rules the states overall and as a whole, each state can come up with their own rules as long as they follow the <em>guidelines </em>provided in the US Constitution.

Explanation:

(I'm in California, so I am looking at Cali's and Florida's AND the US'.) TBH, I'm not sure what the point of this question is. I hope this helps, but I didn't have much context (not your fault or anything) but I did some research. I hope you can piece it all together with some of your own research.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Should habitual offender laws (3-Strikes laws), be used as a sentencing option in US Courts? Are they effective at reducing crim

dalvyx [7]

Three strikes law must reduce recidivism through incapacitation and deterrence of crime

7 0

2 years ago