Answer:
judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution.
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I'd say this just for the fact that the parent didn't kill the coach, but still gave the coach some cash to fix up his car and the bills he had to pay for. it also depends on the type of injuries he got, I guess. thats my thoughts, anyways- I'm just a kid so I'm just giving some input.
The 5th amendment.
Further explanation:
If you have seen those crime shows, usually the defendant is asked if they want to plead the fifth, which means they do not have to testify in court (no self incrimination).
Answer:
Shrek is my favorite anime
Explanation: because
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
