Answer:
Explanation:
If you have a green ARROW to turn left, your turn is protected and oncoming traffic is stopped. If you have an ordinary green LIGHT, your turn is permitted but not protected, and you are expected to yield to oncoming traffic before making your turn.
Answer:
this question is kind of hard to answer because it depends on the circumstances but my main answer is no.
Explanation:
1) if they've committed a crime, then they really shouldn't have the ability to have access to a fire arm, especially if their crime(s) involves a firearm.
2) they gave away their absolute freedom the moment they committed a crime, so they shouldn't get the exact same "freedoms" as the citizens who are completely clean.
3)criminals are seen to have people be more careful around them, so they shouldn't get "free rein"
4)they could commit the crime or a different maybe larger crime if they know there wont be "after jail" consequences.
5) because some criminals cant be fully 100% trusted with certain things.
(i understand they seem repetitive, i had the right idea but i just cant get it to come out the way im thinking it.
The mistake that governments are making when they collaborate in this way with industry is that they conflate the common good with common ground
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
According to Marks the mistakes that the government do when they enter into the collaboration with the industries is that they would not insist on the benefit of people.
He cited the example of General Motors Company who has instilled faulty ignition switches where the government took time to respond to complaints made by the public. He also insists that the government should have proper control over the public private partnerships to prevent casualties in form accidents.
He is of the view that while making collaboration the government should ask the industries to take responsibility in protecting the public from any case eventualities.
