1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
forsale [732]
3 years ago
9

CAn someone give me the answers pls it would really help

Mathematics
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
3 0
Do you need answer for all paper
You might be interested in
Josie grew 15 flowers with 5 seed packets. With 14 seed packets, how many total flowers can Josie have in her garden? Assume the
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

42 flowers

Step-by-step explanation:

15 flowers for every 5 packets

15 ÷ 5 = 3

3 flowers per 1 packet

14 × 3 = 42

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Convert the following statement using an "if-then" structure.
GaryK [48]

Answer:

  D. If John owns a dog, then he owns a cat

Step-by-step explanation:

The implication p → q (if p, then q) has the same truth table as the logical expression ~p∨q. You have the expression ...

  ~(John owns a dog) ∨ (he owns a cat)

Matching parts of this expression to the components of the expression ~p∨q, we see we can choose ...

  • p = John owns a dog
  • q = he owns a cat

and put those into the structure of the implication: if p, then q.

  If John owns a dog, then he owns a cat. . . . . matches choice D

6 0
3 years ago
The inequality x + 2y ≥ 3 is satisfied by point (1, 1).<br> True<br> False
andre [41]
In the given statement above, in this case, the answer would be TRUE. It is true that the  inequality x + 2y ≥ 3 is satisfied by point (1, 1). In order to prove this, we just have to plug in the values. 1 + 2(1) <span> ≥ 3 
So the result is 1 + 2 </span> ≥ 3. 3 <span> ≥ 3, which makes it true, because it states that it is "more than or equal to", therefore, our answer is true. Hope this answer helps.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Item 7 you and a friend are running on treadmills. you run 0.5 mile every 3 minutes, and your friend runs 2 miles every 14 minut
sweet [91]
<span>You run 0.5 miles every 3 minutes => 1 mile every 6 minutes. Your friend runs 2 miles every 14 minutes => 1 mile every 7 minutes. You run a whole number of miles every number of minutes that is a multiple of 6. Your freind runs a whole number of miles every number of minutes that is a multiple of 7 Then the least possible number of miles that you both run to end at the same time is the least common factor of 7 and 6 minutes. This is 7 * 6 = 42 minutes. You will have run 42 min / (6 miles/min) = 7 miles, and your friend will have run 42 min / (7 miles/min) = 6 miles</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Distributive property of 3(2x + 7)
Pavel [41]

Answer:

6x+21

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Find the missing values for multiplication equation 7/8
    6·1 answer
  • What is the responsible estimate of 6207 divided 214
    13·1 answer
  • why does a whole number divided by a fraction less than one have a quotient greater than one number dividend?
    12·1 answer
  • If sinA+cosA=root2cosA then prove cosA-sinA=root2sinA​
    13·1 answer
  • Please help click on the image below
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this math homework please!
    7·2 answers
  • Find the missing side length, 28,25 and x
    5·1 answer
  • Can some1 help me with this please
    7·2 answers
  • An integer divided by 7 gives a result -3 what is that integer?​
    11·2 answers
  • As moist air rises, its temperature will ____
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!