Realist and Liberal perspectives would agree that the international system is inherently anarchic
The notion that there is no supreme authority or sovereign in the world is known as anarchy in the study of international relations. There is no hierarchically superior, coercive authority that can settle conflicts, uphold the law, or regulate the system of international politics in an anarchic state. It is commonly acknowledged that anarchy serves as the foundation for international relations theory.
It is feasible for ordered ties between nations to be maintained in an anarchic international system, contrary to how anarchy is typically understood in the field of international relations. For the realist, liberal, neo- realist, and neo- liberal models of international relations, anarchy provides the underpinnings.
To learn more about Anarchy click here:
brainly.com/question/1133894
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. Personalized.
2. Socialized.
Explanation:
This is because, according to Howell, unethical charismatic leader focuses on personal goals, values and belief, rather than organizational goals, while the ethical charismatic leader focuses on satisfying the organizational and their followers' goals.
Hence, based on research by Howell, unethical charismatic leaders are also called PERSONALIZED, while ethical charismatic leaders are also called SOCIALIZED.
Cro-Magnons had better tools, making them better hunters.
They painted on cave walls.
Answer: is the state of steady internal, physical and chemical conditions maintained by living systems.
Explanation:
The Answer Is B (South Asia)
Hope This Helps !
