Answer:
The correct answer is Option "b. The value of the currency would increase"
Explanation:
The government through the central bank can adopt a variety of measures to control the amount of money supply in the economy. The state uses a combination of monetary and fiscal policies to this effect.
In the given example, the federal government would not print more money due to the implications it has not only on the value of the currency but also on other macroeconomic variables such as interest rates and inflation.
By printing money, there would be an excess amount of money supply in the economy. That would make each dollar in the economy worth less than what it was before. This puts downward pressure on interest rates and boosts inflation as well.
Due to higher inflation, a greater amount of money would be required to continue with normal business which would again cause the need to further increase money supply. Using the law of simple demand and supply, the value of money would keep lowering as money supply is kept increasing. This is why a government might elect to not print money.
I believe that you mean mammals
<u>The answer is "Authoritarian Government".</u>
Authoritarianism, guideline of visually impaired accommodation to authority, instead of individual opportunity of thought and activity. In government, authoritarianism indicates any political framework that amasses control in the hands of a pioneer or a little tip top that isn't naturally mindful to the body of the general population. Authoritarian leaders regularly practice control power arbitrarily and without respect to existing groups of law, and they as a rule can't be supplanted by natives picking uninhibitedly among different competitors in elections.
The answer would be letter C. The branch of ethical theory that considers the origin and meaning of ethical principles is known as Meta ethics. Meta ethics is one of the four branches of ethics and the rest are descriptive ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics.
