The statement that "In the looking at diversity feature "socioeconomic stereotyping" Christa Kilvington, a straight-a student and single mother on public assistance, suggests that the stereotypes people use to classify her shape the way they communicate with her" is true. In the article "In he looking at diversity feature" <span>she describes what it is like being a "4.0 college student" as well as a "welfare mom".</span>
bi-focal eyeglasses, self-winding clock, parachutes, <span>the hot-air </span>balloon, <span>the </span>safety lock, steamboats, and <span>the </span><span>circular saw :)</span>
1. and 2. farmers sowed and harvested crops during seasons around the flooding.
3.They worked to pay off taxes
4. Tame animals
5.Farmers had to go hunting for antelope in the desert beyond the hills
hope this helps and if so plzzz mark me as Brainliest
In general terms, most human beings are committed to obeying the law. However, to give a well-founded answer it's important to take into consideration the concepts of <em>ethics </em>and <em>morality</em> and also the cultures involved in this matter. Having said that, in the dilemma of a person being forced to choose between breaking the law to help a friend or not breaking the law but disappointing a friend, the results I would expect are the following:
The Hindu population (adults and children), based on the complex and inherent concept of <em>Dharma, </em>which assigns a high value to right conduct, ethics and morality, would tend to prioritise the obedience to law while the group of Americans would probably hesitate in this forced decision. Some psychology specialists talk about a moral crisis in America in which the limits of moral conviction, virtues and vices, good and evil, right and wrong are not very clear. If this applies to a vast part of American society, they would not be expected to choose law obedience in first place.
