3 years ago

Why is it necessary for a historian to be sure of the authenticity of a primary source?

1 answer:

5 0

Is this multiple choice? If not, i'd say that it is important for a historian to be sure of the authenticity of a primary source because a primary source needs to be proven to be accurate. It is important to study and make sure the source is authentic because the accuracy must be proven

You might be interested in

Based on this incident, under which principal would a state government be allowed to temporarily set aside the first amendment r

andreev551 [17]

C

Explaining based on incident under which pro picax would state government

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 1832, South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union over what issue?

maria [59]

The imposition of higher tariffs.

3 0

3 years ago

Why were there no other settlements around Fort Sill?

maxonik [38]

Answer:

It was in the middle of indian territory

5 0

1 year ago

The result of the 7 year war was in favor of ____.

Ratling [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

hope it helps

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who suffered when Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes?

vlabodo [156]

Answer:

The Calvinist Protestants of France

Explanation:

The Edict of Nantes was signed by King Henry IV in 1598, granting French Protestants rights in a Catholic Nation, thus allowing them to own lands and titles. In 1865 Louis XIV revoked the Edict and declared Protestantism illegal, thus starting persecution of protestants in France.

6 0

3 years ago