1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naya [18.7K]
3 years ago
15

How long did it take for Rome to be built

History
2 answers:
sergiy2304 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1,000 years

Explanation:

The Roman Empire evolved over many centuries, but tradition holds that the city of Rome itself was founded in 753 B.C. As a city that is still standing today, Rome has never been completely finished.

Rome and its surrounding land took centuries to evolve into what would become the Roman Empire. Due to the dedication of Roman emperors and the labor of citizens and soldiers, Rome became the massive superpower that ruled so much of Europe and the Middle East in ancient times.

There is a famous adage that states, "Rome wasn't built in a day." This quote, according to Dictionary.com, is used to urge someone to be patient, as it is not always possible to make big things happen right away.

lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
5 0
It’s about 1,000 years .. maybe more
You might be interested in
Revitalizacion del comercio en la nueva españa (informacion)
o-na [289]

Answer:

puedes ir aquí por ayuda

ir a la academia khan y luego buscar la introducción de españa

4 0
3 years ago
Why is Akbar the Great significant?
cupoosta [38]

Akbar was accorded the epithet "the Great" because of his many accomplishments, including his record of unbeaten military campaigns that consolidated Mughal rule in the Indian subcontinent. The basis of this military prowess and authority was Akbar's skilful structural and organisational calibration of the Mughal army.

6 0
3 years ago
What was his motivation for his policy
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Elaborate. this doesnt give enough detail
7 0
3 years ago
Should parliament approve the Munich agreement
Dennis_Churaev [7]

The Munich Agreement should not have been approved by the Parliament.

Explanation:

The Munich Agreement was at the end of a long list of policies of appeasement that ended up aggravating and resulted in the world war. This was avoidable because after the Versailles treaty either the powers could have doubled down on Germany or offered them more generous terms.

Instead what was done was that the Nazis were allowed to take over smaller territories while the allied nations sat back and watched and agreed to it. This emboldened Germany and eventually made the war possible.

6 0
4 years ago
Explain how the World War III war took place.
yulyashka [42]
No World War III.

Hope this helps.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who did Thomas Jefferson accused of tyranny in the Declaration of Independence
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the lymphatic system the most impacted by the plague?
    15·1 answer
  • What was Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative?
    15·1 answer
  • Select the three statements that are true of the Crusades: They created a demand for Eastern goods. They failed to rescue the Ho
    10·2 answers
  • Who was the 43rd President of the United States?
    7·2 answers
  • How do American romanticism reflect life in America during this period?
    14·1 answer
  • In field experiements, south american guppies transplanted from
    15·1 answer
  • The Axis powers included all EXCEPT:<br> China<br> Italy<br> Germany<br> Japan
    15·1 answer
  • How might scientists be able to use fossils to infer that the climate of the central United States was a lush subtropical forest
    8·1 answer
  • List three things you notice about these images related to Buddhism that interest you.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!