1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga55 [171]
3 years ago
7

Do you think that expert witnesses should be paid in court? Why or why not?

Law
2 answers:
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No

Explanation:

An expert witness should NOT be paid in court. If you were a victim in a crime, you would want anyone who saw anything to speak up about what they witnessed, so they can identify the suspect. You shouldn't be rewarded for doing the right thing.

Rzqust [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:Yes

Explanation:

If it was a normal witness they shouldn't be paid because they are only telling what they saw. But if it is a expert witness who is going out of their way to say information. They should be paid, because they are not forced by law to talk.

You might be interested in
advantages and disadvantages of the existence of political dynasty in the Philippines. Write a brief explanation for each item
Sloan [31]

Answer:

Disadvantages:

1. Undue Advantage due to the <em>Carnegie Effect</em>

Andrew Carnegie postulated that it was more discretionary for him to give out all his wealth to non-family member given that his children, given the expectation of inheritance of their father's estate, were most likely to have less incentive or motivation to work for themselves or build their own wealth. This thinking became known as the <em>Carnegie Effect.</em>

This effect is recurrent and prevalent among dynastic politicians as they are imbued with an advantage over their non-dynastic political peers right from birth. This means that regardless of their capabilities, they are more likely to, when faced with a non-dynastic politician, in an election.

This kind of effect is unhealthy for the political process of the Phillippines.

2. Abuse of power leading to graft, bribery, and conflicts of interests.

Dynasties in the Phillippines have been known to use their offices to enrich themselves at the expense of the state. Evidence also shows that the political system is rife with bribery, especially when a dynastic politician needs to have their own interests represented at the regardless of what is good for the state. It is not uncommon for the incumbent dynasty to suppress political opponents with better policy mandates as to how the state of Phillippines can run.

In the long run, this leads to the impoverishment and rigidity of state thus reducing its ability to respond to the development.

Advantages

1. Unlike non-dynastic politicians who have a limited term in office, Dynastic politicians, due to the long term of office, have a greater incentive to initiate, execute and complete long term projects, especially those within their jurisdiction. Continuity is good for economic development.

2. It is true that Dynastic politicians have an undue advantage in politics when compared to their non-dynastic counterparts. This undue advantage has led to the rise of female political leaders who use their dynastic connections (directly or indirectly) to come to power.

Cheers

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these acts is least likely to take place in a totalitarian system?
White raven [17]

Answer:AExplanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Why does the earth go around the sun?
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

Just as the Moon orbits the Earth because of the pull of Earth's gravity, the Earth orbits the Sun because of the pull of the Sun's gravity. ... But the gravity of the Sun alters its course, causing it to travel around the Sun, in a shape very near to a circle.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was responsible for passing the Canadian bill of rights?
solniwko [45]

Answer:

John Diefenbaker

Explanation:

I searched itup

8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
A person born in a US territory, one parent is a US citizen who has lived in the US for at least 1 year. This person is consider
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

u,s citizen

Explanation:hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Methods of controlling mosquito breed<br>​
    7·2 answers
  • (There is a photo of a door with blood splatter)
    5·1 answer
  • A bank lends money to a family so that it can buy a new house. This lets the family pay for the house over time instead of havin
    15·1 answer
  • Can I cop pull me over for looking too young too drive?
    7·2 answers
  • (DO NOT GIVE FALSE ANSWERS)
    7·2 answers
  • Why do countries pursue the macroeconomic goal of economic growth?
    15·2 answers
  • A group of historians are researching the Great Depression in the United States and the events that led to the stock market cras
    6·2 answers
  • What is environmental studies??
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me with this question
    15·1 answer
  • The constitution and its amendments expressly prohibit all of the following except.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!