Yes very right good job because force model for police and law
Answer:
U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Express (Amex)
Explanation:
The sequence of decisions is reproduced as follows;
1.The trail court ruled in favor of Amex
2. On petition to federal court by the other party, the federal court reversed and overturned the decision of trial court and decided that the clause was not forcible because of the exorbitant cost structure and scenario.
3.U.S Supreme again ruled in favor of Amex where U.S supreme court upheld that Federal Arbitration Act does not allow the judiciary to null and void a contractual relinquishment of the legal rights based merely on the grounds that Italian colors restaurant's dispute resolution costs exceed any potential amounts to be recovered.
Answer:
may justify or excuse an accused defendant's actions, and which will tend to show the defendant is not guilty or has no criminal intent.
Explanation:
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott decision that Congress had exceeded its authority in the Missouri Compromise because it had no power to forbid or abolish slavery in the territories west of Missouri and north of latitude 36°30′.