In this scenario, Roger's behaviour would best be classified as an elaborator.
While working in a group each individual contributes in their own ways.
Benne and Sheats defined roles in a group and classified them in three categories. These categories are
1. Task roles : relate to actually achieving the task goals.
2. Personal Roles : relate to the interpersonal relationships between team members. A highly qualified team, when all team members with a high ego will not be able to achieve the desired goal within the deadline.
3.Dysfunctional Roles: do not contribute in any way to a group. They are only interested in serving their own interests and more often than not, are responsible for disruptions and discord within the group.
The right combination of various roles in a group goes a long way in achieving a goal.
The Elaborator is a task role. The Elaborator takes up an idea and gives his views on how that idea might turn out if it is implemented in the given suggestion.
The part of the combined price allocated to the product is less than 50% which might be around 35-40%.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Since the price of the product all alone is $450 and the price of the service alone is $550, so the combined amount totals up to be nothing less than $1000. But the company under the discount and offer, offers the both things combined for $800.
This shows that the company is under some loss which it has to incur. The loss is of $200 under the discount to be offered to the clients which serves as the incentive to the customers.
DONT PRESS THAT LINK IVE SEEN IT EVERYWHERE
Answer:
Neither project should be chosen
Explanation:
Given that
Each project cost of capital is 12%
The IRR of project A is 11.4%
And, the IRR of project B is 11.1%
As we can see that the cost of capital of each project with their internal rate of return so no project should be selected
Therefore the above statement represent an answer
The same should be relevant
Answer:
farther to the right than temporary tax cuts
Explanation:
The permanent tax cuts have more impact on consumption spending than temporary one. A permanent tax cut raises the expected lifetime wealth and increases autonomous consumption, thus leading to an upward shift of the consumption function. Consequently the permanent tax cuts shift the AD curve farther to the right compared to the temporary tax cuts.
