Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the 32nd President of the United States. He successfully led America through the Great Depression and World War II. Franklin was diagnosed with infantile paralysis in 1921 when he was 39 years old.
Despite being physically crippled, he reinforced America with confidence and strength.
The historian James Tobin, in his interview, once said that Roosevelt, though was crippled but this disability helped him to gain strength and confidence.<u> His struggle to overcome his affliction was the most important contribution in the development of his confidence and strength</u>.
So, the correct answer is option D.
Out of the human relations skills, the one that is most clearly related to communication is the skill of listening.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Human relations are the ultimate result of the preluding process of communication that happens among humans. When a vocal-verbal communication is two way, it involves the actions of speaking and listening.
Listening allows the communicating parties to understand the message conveyed by the other party. A two-way vocal-verbal communication is thus impossible without the action of listening.
Answer: Depends..
Explanation: Could you provide more context regarding the question? You can do this through screenshot, comment, or editing the post. Doing so will help you effectively get the answers you need.
Hope this helps!
Having children of my on, I believe that children need to express their fears that way they know early in life, what and what not to be scared or frightened of. It also depends on the limit of violence in the nature of the environment.
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
