Answer: D last one
I hope this helps you
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": That the oral agreement fell outside the statute of frauds if the plaintiff satisfied the main-purpose doctrine.
Explanation:
<em>Power Entertainment Inc. </em>sued <em>National Football League Properties Inc.</em>(NFLP), saying the other party violated an oral agreement to allow it to assume a third party debt if the other party would allow it to acquire valuable third party business licenses previously held. The Court of Appeals ruled that fraud status did not apply in such cases in Texas, the state where it all took place.
Answer:the answer is C.
Explanation: he wanted to make the comparison between the civil war and American revolution and fighting for equality
Answer:
No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is not true because the limitation was not communicated to her. Since she walked into a store and asked to have her dress cleaned, the individual at the front desk should have explicitly mentioned the pricing and policy to her so that she knew what she was accepting by leaving her dress at the store. Since they did not do this then they must pay her the $300 that the dress is worth.
<span>Reynelda can best be described as showing: </span>Foreclosure
