Answer:
$400,000
Explanation:
Since at December 31, Year 5, Tedd's tax advisor believed that an unfavorable outcome was <u>probable</u>. And a <u>reasonable estimate </u>of additional taxes was $400,000 but could be as much as $600,000.
Although after the Year 5 financial statements were issued, Tedd received and accepted an IRS settlement offer of $450,000.
Tedd should have included an amount of $400,000 as accrued liability in its December 31, Year 5 balance sheet
The reason is that according to the International Financial Reporting Standards, a PROVISION must be made as long as the conditions below were obtainable at year end.
- Existing Condition (which in this case is the tax dispute with the IRS)
- Probable Cash Outflow (which Tedd's Tax adviser confirmed)
- Reliable Estimate of Outflow ( which the scenario stated ''A reasonable estimate of additional taxes was $400,000'')
Hence, such 'reasonable estimate is the appropriate amount for inclusion in the financial statements.
Answer:
Efficient market school.
Explanation:
Efficient market school is the market school which argues that forward exchange rates do the best possible job for forecasting future spot exchange rates, so investing in exchange rate forecasting services would be a waste of time because it is impossible to have a consistent alpha generation on a risk adjusted excess returns basis as market prices are only affected by new informations.
The efficient market school also known as the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is a hypothesis that states that asset (share) prices reflect all information and it is very much impossible to consistently beat the market.
Also, forward exchange rates are exchange rates controlling foreign exchange transactions at a specific future date or time.
<em>Hence, according to the efficient market school it would be a waste of time investing in exchange rate forecasting services because all the information about an asset or security is already factored into their prices and as a result of the randomness of the market. </em>
Answer:
<h3>I don't know otherwise please marks me as brainliests..</h3>
Answer:
a. AD curve will shift to the right
b. AD curve will shift to the left
c. Movement along the AD curve.
Explanation:
a. When firms become more optimistic and increase their spending on machineries,this brings about changes in investment and it will cause a shift to the right in the aggregate demand curve.
b. When The federal government increases taxes in an attempt to reduce a budget deficit. This will cause a change in consumption as people will have less money to spend since disposable income has been reduced, and it will cause the aggregate demand curve to shift inwards to the left.
c. A 4 percent in US inflation will bring about a change in price level and there will be a movement along the aggregate demand curve.
