False. History is equally important to individuals as it is for groups.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Explanation:
<u>Military installations can be defined as the locations directly operated by the military itself.</u> It is used for many purposes manifested below:
* It provides accommodation facilities to the military.
* It provides training facilities for the military.
* Military can base their equipment there in these military installations.
* Military can conduct their operations secretly from these installation.
* They are also used to store food for the military.
* Some military installation are also used for aviation purposes and known as air bases.
* Military installation when used for military ships are known as naval bases.
