The answer is A because rome was one of the most functional cities of the time
Answer:
<h2>Mark me brainliest plz （⌒▽⌒）（⌒▽⌒）</h2>
Explanation:
- <em>The definition of community is all the people living in an area or a group or groups of people who share common interests. ... A group of people living together or in the same locality or who share interests or a sense of </em><em>i</em><em>d</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>Being a part of a community makes us feel as though we are a part of something greater than ourselves. It gives us opportunities to connect with people, to reach for our goals, to make us feel safe and secure. A true community is about being connected and responsible for what happens.</em>
- <em>A society is a group of individuals involved in persistent social interaction, or a large social group sharing the same spatial or social territory, typically subject to the same political authority and dominant cultural </em><em>expectations</em><em> </em><em>According to sociologists, a society is a group of people with common territory, interaction, and culture. Social groups consist of two or more people who interact and identify with one another. ... Geographic distance and language barriers can separate societies within a country.</em>
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Well, you own what is in your title, which means your lawn, and sometimes mineral but not always.
Answer:
A. Children who are different from others are more likely to be bullied.
Explanation:
A child who is different from others, stands out among his peers and is likely to be bullied. For example, children who are different from their peer physically such as dwarfs, obese, deformed are more likely to be bullied. Children who are also different in their mental capacity compared to their peers are also likely to be bullied, e.g. mentally impaired children.
On the contrary, children who blend in easily with their peers are not easily spotted out or bullied.
