Technical feasibility is concerned with issues such as political repercussions of using an information system and meeting the requirements of the information privacy act.
<h3>How would you define technical viability?</h3>
Technical viability An exhaustive analysis of the project's input, processes, output, fields, programs, and procedures is known as a technical feasibility study. It works wonders for long-term planning and problem solving. The technological feasibility assessment should primarily complement an organization's financial data.
<h3>How should a technical feasibility study be written?</h3>
- Recap your strategy. To start your technical feasibility analysis, provide a summary of your strategy.
- Make a decision regarding your unique selling proposition.
- Be prepared for all obstacles....
- Think about your finances.
Learn more about Technical feasibility: brainly.com/question/14208774
#SPJ4
The answer is b
Please give me a THANKS and also the brainiest answer/crown! :)
Answer:Groupthink
Explanation:
It was postulated by the Psychologist called Irving Janis in 1972. Groupthink is when individuals come together to make certain decisions collectively while discarding their personal beliefs and making sure there is no form of dissent. This decisions however may not be the best or optimally efficient.
Answer:
The Kelo case proved to be a revelation for many New Londoners about their property rights. Small business owners like me have to be especially careful to avoid falling under the radar of government development projects.
Until now, I was under the impression that eminent domain gave the government the right to take private property as long as it was for public use. My assumption included that public use defined anything that the public could literally use. Apparently, the court went with a broader interpretation of public use under which “a taking is constitutional if it serves a public purpose” (Kelo v. City of New London).
This interpretation means public use includes anything that is deemed as fit for public purpose, even though I or most citizens may not be able to directly use it. This raises the concern of what all could fall under public use. I trust that the government won’t go on seizing private properties for its unrestrained use. However, the Kelo case still proves to be a matter of concern for me.
Although the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution provides a certain safeguard, the wider interpretation of public use makes it easier for businesses like mine to lose ownership of their property to the government.
Explanation:
