Answer: :a. Retrospectively
Explanation:
A change in depreciation method is a change in accounting policy and as such it would need to be accounted for retrospectively.
This means that it must be accounted for by going back to all periods where the change affects an entry and adjusting that entry for the change so that the accounting can be more accurate.
He may be liable for<u> "damages, fines, or imprisonment."</u>
Copyright law does not contain any proviso that enables unapproved gatherings to make individual duplicates of copyrighted items. Be that as it may, under the teaching of "reasonable utilize," people might be allowed to make reinforcement duplicates or authentic duplicates of a few materials as long as specific conditions are met. Making a duplicate of a copyrighted work for your very own usability is probably going to be considered copyright encroachment. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you are making a duplicate so you may utilize a copyrighted item on the off chance that the first is stolen, harmed or devastated, your direct may fall inside the teaching of reasonable utilize.
Answer:
PMT = $95,000
Rate = 4%
Life = 8 years
a. Amount to be deposited today
= PV(Rate, N, -PMT)
= PV(4%, 8, -95,000)
= $639,610.76
b. Amount in account after 3rd withdrawal
= PV(Rate, N, -PMT)
= PV(4%, 5, -95,000)
= $422,913.12
c. Balance in account after 8th withdrawal
= = PV(Rate, N, -PMT)
= PV(4%, 0, -95,000)
= $0
d. How much would you have at the end of 8 years?
= FV(4%, 8, -639610.76)
= $875,351.49