If you follow the steps proposed by the CRAAP test you can check whether the one responsible for the news/article(s) has any motivation to favor one side of the story, if the story is relevant, for instance, what is more relevant for the future of a nation? A governmental transaction or what a famous person has to say about Trump or Obama? Maybe highlighting the latter would be a strategy to hide or diminish the impact of the former piece of news, a smoke screen because itis easier to dwelve into what somebody says, gossip, than to check the truthfulness of some information about what is going on with some politicians.
Also, sometimes people get half of the story or are simply misled to believe a distortion of the true facts, that is why it is important to check if the information is verifiable and indeed if the information is true.
Answer:
•Helps in reducing heatiny/ cooling load.
•Helps in optimizing daylight.
•First cost and recurring savings.
•Helps in utilizing latest technological advances.
•Stimulation models greatly helps in designing high •performance envelops.
I hope this answers your question:)
<span>The triangular model of love is Sternberg's theory of love. The theory says that all of our different positive emotions are the result of different combinations of intimacy, passion, and decision/commitment. </span>According to Robert Sternberg's triangular model of love, intimacy involves closeness and caring—championing the interests of the loved one, even if it entails sacrificing one's own.
<h2>The 8 differences between good governance and bad governance are: </h2>
Explanation:
1. Good governance is the process of decision-making and the method that implements the decisions. Whereas Bad Governance is the unfavorable relationship between the people who govern and the people who are governed in terms of decision-making.
2. Good governance comprises rule of law, assistance, equitable and inclusive democracy. Whereas, political instability, weak civil society and problem in bureaucracy defines the term Bad Governance.
3. Effective, responsive, transparent and efficient institutions are the outcome of good governance. Whereas, unregulated private organisations, underdevelopment and unemployment are the outcomes of Bad Governance.
4. Good Governance assures that corruption is minimized. Whereas, Bad Governance is centralized with the idea of corruption.
5. Good Governance focuses on transparency and accountability. Whereas, Bad Governance lacks transparency and accountability.
6. The voices of the people in risk are considered in decision-making of Good Governance. The opinions of people are not considered by the governing body in Bad Governance.
7. Good governance and democracy are interrelated. Whereas, Bad Governance lacks to justify the word Democracy.
8. Good governance boost the economic growth of a country. Whereas, Bad governance creates bad impact on the economic of the country.
Answer:
Banks can borrow from the federal reserve system at discount rate.
Explanation:
The fed provides the fund for banks to increase their reserves through open market operations. The fed purchases government securities or bonds to increase reserves with banks.
If a bank is not able to borrow funds for its reserves from the Fed funds market, then, in that case, it can borrow from the federal reserve system at a discount window.
The rate at which it has pay back this loan is called the discount rate. This rate is used as a tool by the feds to control the money supply. The discount rate serves as a tool for monetary policy.