Answer:
Explanation:
A proton of charge
q=+1.609×10^-19C
Orbit a radius of 12cm
r=0.12m
Magnetic Field of 0.31T
Angle between velocity and field is 90°
a. Because the magnetic force F supplies the centripetal force Fc.
The magnitude of the magnetic force F on a charge q moving at a speed v in a magnetic field of strength B is given by
F = qvB sin θ
And the centripetal force is given as
Fc=mv²/r
Where m is mass of proton
m=1.673×10^-27kg
Then, F=Fc
qvB sin θ=mv²/r
qBSin90=mv/r
rqB=mv
Then, v=rqB/m
v=0.12×1.609×10^-19×0.31/1.673×10^-23
v=3577692.78m/s
v=3.58×10^6m/s
b. Since,
F=qVBSin90
F=1.609×10^-19×3.58×10^6×0.31
F=1.785×10^-13 N.
Answer:
Abiotic - sun Biotic- Plants
Water supply, climate, shape of the land, vegetation, soils and availability of natural resources.
Explanation:
Abiotic means non living so the sun is non living. The sun gives us warmth and the ability to survive
Biotic means alive or living- plants are living and give off oxygen and take in carbon to help us live umm ok
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
