<span>The net benefits of each public good will be the total cost of the project minus the $300 cost per person. If the project costs 600$ the net benefits for each public good will be $300.
$600(total cost) - $300(cost per person) = $300(net benefits)</span>
Answer:
The rationale for conducting active policy is the interest of Congress to alter the state of the economy through a deliberate change in established policies.
But in the case of Passive policy, the government permits the status quo.
Active policy relies on the government to enforce it while passive policy does not need the government's interference to work in stabilizing the economy.
Explanation:
The following statements applies passive policy because the economy is expected to stabilize on it's own without the deliberate act of congress influencing it:
- Economic circumstances can change dramatically between the time that an economic downturn begins and the time when policy actions have an effect on the economy.
- Fluctuations in economic output have been less severe since World War II.
The following statements is a rationale for conducting active policy since the government's intervention is required:
- Economists are not very accurate forecasters.
- Increases in government spending generate increases in economic output.
Answer:
Ruby should go to college.
Explanation:
Ruby is currently 50 years old and earning $50,000 per year.
She would like to retire at 67.
She is thinking of going back to college, to complete a graduate degree.
After completing a graduate degree from the college she would earn $55,000.
The total cost of a graduate degree is $75,000.
Ruby still has 17 years to work and earn.
Her income will increase by $5,000 after college
The increase in income earned after college until retirement
= $5,000 
17
= $85,000
Since the increase in income is greater than the cost of going to college, Ruby should go to college.
Answer:
CMR: 52% --> each dollar of sales generates 52 cent of contribution
VCR: 48% --> 48 cent per dollar of sales are cost
BEPu: 10,000 units will pay up the cost to purchasethis units and the fixed cost for the business.
BEPs: $ 250,000 in sales pay up both, fixed and varible operating cost.
Explanation:
selling price per hat: $ 25
variable cost per hat: $ 12
Contribution per unit $ 13
Contribution Ratio:
13/25 = 0.52
Variable cost Ratio:
12/25 = 0.48
Fixed cost: 130,000
Break even point:
dollars of sales BEP: 250,000
units sold to pay up variable and fixed cost: 10,000
So lets say we have two investment opportunities. A new convenient store in your neighborhood or a new shopping center more than 5 miles away from where you live... What would you invest in well lets look at the pros and cons of each investment. So even though the new convenient store is right around the corner from you and prices are low the new shopping center has better products, warranty and higher prices unlike the convenient store closer to you. So we have an investment budget of $1000 dollars and want to spend it wisely we need to access what has a better chance of being successful with what you put into it. So the convenient store will reach less people has a bargain price but also doesn't have security cameras. Even though the shopping center has great employees, top-of-the-line products, high security, and a great establishment but also has flaws. What are you gonna invest in, will you take risks? My personal opinion is that I would invest in the shopping center because more people would be attracted to it because of the quality of service and products. So it would have a better probability in success and good use of my money.
