Just g00gle oprah winfrey profile and fill it in
In the persuasion elaboration likelihood model, the central route is more persuasive when people have the ability and the motivation to pay attention. Persuasion is formed through two routes:
The peripheral route is used when people's motivation is low and there is no ability to process the message. The central route is used when there is high motivation and message processing capacity.
Therefore, the attitudes formed in the central route are more consistent, and resistant to contrary arguments, and more likely to determine people's behaviors and attitudes, generating changes in attitudes and durability.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/7147946
Because there is a difficulty in quantifying, putting in numbers, the value of community and cooperative organizations. So the conclusion is simple: If you can not quantify you can not measure and if there is difficulty in quantifying, there is the same difficulty in measuring.
Answer:
A. TRUE
Explanation:
Application : Application for the assistance of federal financial directly from the FEMA.
Subapplication : Application for assistance for the federal financial that is indirectly access through some pass-through entity. (Applicant to FEMA or Subapplicant to the Applicant)
Subapplicant : A state agency, territorial government, local government or any federally-recognized tribal government who submits a sub-application to an applicant for the assistance under the FEMA's hazard mitigation grant programs.
Yes it is true that an applicant user with access to submit or sign can submit as well as update, review the status, fill and can complete the applicant who is acting as the sub-applicant sub-application.
The correct answer is a hypothesis
In the scientific method, a hypothesis can be defined as the provisional or attempted solution to a given problem. The level of truth attributed to such a hypothesis will depend on how the empirical data collected support or not what is stated in the hypothesis. This process, known as empirical contrasting of the hypothesis, can be carried out through confirmation (in the case of universal hypotheses) or verification (in the case of existential hypotheses).
