In the long run, perfectly competitive firms will react to profits by increasing production.
Firms in a perfectly competitive world earn zero profit in the long run. While firms can earn accounting profits in the long run, they cannot earn economic profits.
In the long run, perfectly competitive firms will react to profits by decreasing production. CORRECT: In the long run, perfectly competitive firms will respond to losses by exiting the market. In the long run, perfectly competitive firms will respond to losses by reducing production.
A perfectly competitive market achieves long‐run equilibrium when all firms are earning zero economic profits and when the number of firms in the market is not changing.
In the long run, profits and losses are eliminated because an infinite number of firms are producing infinitely divisible, homogeneous products. Firms experience no barriers to entry and all consumers have perfect information.
Learn more about a perfectly competitive firm here: brainly.com/question/25327136
#SPJ4
Given:
<span>Fact 1: During contract negotiations, BB’s sales representative promised that the system was “A-1” and “perfect.”
</span><span>Fact 2: The written contract, which the parties later signed, disclaimed all warranties, express and implied.
</span><span>Fact 3: After installation the computer produced only random numbers and letters, rather than the desired accounting information
The express warranty is given in Fact 1 where the Sales Rep promised that the system was "A-1" and "perfect". There is a breach in express warranty here IF the written contract also expresses the same promises.
However, the written contract </span>disclaimed all warranties, express and implied. AND BOTH PARTIES SIGNED THIS CONTRACT. It implies that the buyer has read through the contract and has agreed with what is written in the contract. Thus, they can't file a suit against BB for breaching an express warranty since the written and signed contract has already disclaimed all warranties.
Answer:
$850
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Initial investment = $15,000
Expected annual net cash flows over four years, R = $5,000
Return on the investment = 10% = 0.10
Present value of an annuity factor for 10% and 4 periods, PVAF = 3.1699
The present value of $1 factor for 10% and 4 periods = 0.6830
Now,
Net present value = [ R × PVAF ] - Initial investment
= [ $5,000 × 3.1699 ] - $ 15,000
= $15,849.50 - $ 15000
= $849.50 ≈ $850
I think this is an example of self-serving bias. This is the tendency of people to attribute positive outcomes to personal factors, but attribute negative outcomes to external factors such as other people. The reason people have this tendency because personalizing success or positive outcomes helps their self-esteem.
Answer:
A. expose customers to high-margin items.
Explanation:
Retail layout refers to how retailers organize the shelf space and allocate all the products in a way that allows them to influence customer decisions. The objectives of the layout include creating a good customer experience and allowing customers to access easily the products with higher margins to generate more value for the company. According to this, the answer is that a key objective for a retail layout is to expose customers to high-margin items.
