Answer:
They portray american and Mexican soldiers as heroes of war. They could be fighting against each other but from each side they are heroes of war and a hero to their country.
Explanation:
The answer is that this is not plagiarism.
Explanation:
The learner has created and elaborated the content of the writing by giving to the text her or his own words. Even though what is in the content is very similar to the first version, there is no any kind of plagiarism because the student is paraphrasing the text.
Answer:
The field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of Dr. Original's original research. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Explanation:
It is acceptable for scientific research to be replicated by different researchers. However, the publication of a scientific research classified as a replica must contain credits to the original research, otherwise it will be considered plagiarism.
In this case, in relation to the example shown in the question above, we can say that the field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of the original research, carried out by Dr. Original. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Answer:
To ensure Ratification
Explanation:
Bill of Rights was added to Constitution to ensure ratification. ... To ensure ratification of the document, the Federalists offered concessions, and the First Congress proposed a Bill of Rights as protection for those fearful of a strong national government.
Hope it helps!
