Answer:
I would use judicial activism.
Explanation:
Judicial activism refers to a judge or court that is more willing to invalidate legal or governmental action. This concept is therefore broader than the strict right of review, whereby a judge checks to what extent a law, decision or measure is in accordance with a law of a higher order such as a constitution or a treaty. Therefore, as a judge, I would evaluate the constitutionality of the different laws and government actions, interpreting their legality in a broad way, and not only limiting myself to the text of the law.
Your Highness,
it is from deep respect for the crown and the old ways of our countries that I ask you only to hear my claims.
We are going through a new dawn of men. People want to guide their own fate in many ways now, and those desires cannot be fulfilled by the crown. Any crown. Only the people can guide the people to where they wish to go, even if that is not a good place to be.
Although the crown cannot provide the sense of power over our destinies that we all wish to have at some point during our lives, the people has deep respect for culture and traditions, and there is no kingdom without a King or a Queen.
So I humbly ask of thee to represent us, to hear the people and to be the voice of reason, the voice of men and the voice of women to other countries and to the parliament.
Be our King and our Queen, but not above the law. Be the greatest you can be by following the same rules that the other countrymen will follow, and I promise much more respect and admiration from all than you would ever have through the old ways.
Some people didn't have homes at the time so they would pretty much become an indentured servant so they can have a place to live until their "Contract" was up.
Answer:
B. It became more conservative.
Explanation:
just got it right on the quiz
