A lasting emotional bond between people that begins before birth and influences relationships throughout life is called <u>attachment</u>.
Attachment is the deep and enduring emotional bond shared between a baby and its parents. Parents become attached to newborn babies, so too babies become attached to their parents.
The attachment is developed throughout the growing years of the child, and through various experiences. The earliest may be a parent hearing the cry of her baby and being overwhelmed with love and compassion. Babies too quickly learn who their caregivers are and become increasingly attached to them.
The emotional bond continues to grow as a baby becomes a young child, then an adolescent, a teenage, and finally a young man or woman.
To learn more about emotional bonds: brainly.com/question/9112595
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:
</u>
For an underage passenger who is traveling in a car without the seatbelt on, the adult who is driving the car is responsible.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- It is considered conventionally and by law, that if an adult is traveling to somewhere in a car with underage people, the adult is responsible for their in-vehicle safety.
- Hence, the adult has to make sure that all the safety precautions are taken care of when he is hosting underage people in the vehicle that he is driving.
The correct answer is "Political participation by all citizens."
What the moralistic political culture expects and encourages is "Political participation by all citizens.
Let's have in mind that political culture is the series of values and belief systems that structures any political action.
The moralistic political structure puts emphasis on the necessities of the citizens. Of course, this approach is in opposition to the individualistic political culture and the traditionalistic political culture.
The moralistic political structure believes that the federal government is responsible for the welfare of the people so it has to create the kinds of social programs that benefit the citizens. So we can say it has to focus on the welfare of the majority, over the individualistic approach.
The answer to this statement is yes. It is because a person with limited mental capacity should be granted of arbitration clause by the next of kin who signed of the behalf of the person because of the fact that the individual is mentally disabled.