There are actually two European Countries that has the biggest influence. Those two Countries are Germany and Italy, that’s because those are the most powerful countries in the bloc, holding incredible influence over other states.
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
Answer: =3 3/7
Explanation: Rewriting our equation with parts separated
=6+3/7−1−6/3
Solving the whole number parts
6−1=5
Solving the fraction parts
3/7−6/3=
The correct answer would be, Reformation.
Sometimes a contract does not accurately reflect the intentions of the parties because of some mechanical or clerical error in the document. When this happens, a legal action called a Reformation is necessary to correct the contract.
Explanation:
When two parties make a deal about anything, they write a contract which contains the clauses for that deal. But sometimes the contract does not accurately reflect the intentions of the parties, due to some mechanical or clerical error.
So when this happens, then the court orders the parties to rewrite the part of the contract which appears to be having wrong intentions. Actually, the court allows the parties to take some action and remove or correct the discrepancy.
This is called as Reformation.
Learn more about Reformation at:
brainly.com/question/14283313
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Cleisthenes
Explanation:
Cleisthenes or as historians refer to him <em>"a father of Athenian democracy"</em> was born around 570 BC. He assumed leadership of Athens and began to reform its government. New basis for a democratic structure was the ten tribes according to their area of residence (or <em>deme</em>). Ten demes were divided among three regions, contrary to traditional tribes which were based on family relations. His reforms were called <em>inosomia</em>, instead of <em>demokratia</em>.
