<em>Part </em><em>A</em>
<em>5.4-3.1=2.3 - time </em><em>David</em>
<em>Part </em><em>B</em>
<em>4</em><em>,</em><em>9</em><em>+</em><em>3</em><em>.</em><em>1</em><em>=</em><em>8</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>time </em><em>T</em><em>ed</em>
<em>Part </em><em>C</em>
<em>So</em><em> </em><em>answers</em><em>:</em><em> </em>
<em>1</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>.</em><em>3</em>
<em>2</em><em>. </em><em>8</em>
You're welcome amigo
Answer:
a) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.
Explanation:
A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: "Citizens of our state are thriving. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefitted from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term."
This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism? It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.The senator's argument says that the condition which is low unemployment in the state is the effect of his economic packages, but the condition existed before he ever had the chance to introduce those packages. That is the major flaw of this argument.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>The distribution of a sample mean tends to be skewed to the right or left. </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>The sampling distribution</em><em> is described as one of the probability distribution related to a statistic discovered via an entirely large number of various samples that are being drawn from a particular population. However, the "sampling distribution" of a particular population refers to the distribution of distinct frequencies related to a range of various outcomes that can occur towards the statistics of a given population. </em>
They created the valleys because they pulled them downstream
Answer:
<h2>The Tri-Chromtic theory</h2>
Explanation:
The Tri-chromatic theory is based on the assumption that the three classes of cone receptors sub serve the colour vision. This theory dates back to 18th century and was popular during the first half of 20th century and was often used against the opponent processes theory. It was also known as Young-Helmholtz theory of colour vision, according to this theory there are three receptors in the retina that are responsible for the perception of colour. These receptors have different sensitivity level. Blues ones are the most sensitive and the red ones the least. But to perceive the colour needs the interaction between at least two photo receptors. Then the three colours are combined to form any colour in the visible spectrum.
