Answer:
So they don't become dictators themselves. It's also important to students so they can learn about society. Such as Russia on how it's a columnist country. Putin is a dictator and that's very good for children's real-world problems!
Explanation: Good luck! (✿◠‿◠)
Answer:
The correct response is: Sasha is in the final stage of grieving her partner's death as demonstrated by her newfound self-reliance and greater appreciation for life.
Explanation:
According to psychiatrist Elizabeth Kübler-Ross, there are 5 stages of grief: denial
; anger
; bargaining; depression; and acceptance. Sasha experiences a major change in her life and she probably went through stages of grief where she felt upended about many things. In the acceptance stage of grief, a person starts to see there are more good days than bad, although they may still feel remorse and longing from time to time, which is normal. At the acceptance stage, a grieving partner can start to feel fortunate for having time with their deceased partner and for having fond memories.
Answer: the right answer is C. the covenants of seisin, right to convey, quiet enjoyment, warranty and further assurances.
Explanation:
Covenant of seisin denotes the legal possession of a feudal fiefdom or an state in land.
The Right to convey covenant means that the owner can sell or dispose of his or her property.
Quiet enjoyment refers to the right that the grantee or tenant has to undisturbed use and enjoyment of real property.
Warranty.- the grantor promises that owns the property and has the legal right to convey it.
Further assurances means that upon demand by the grantee the grantor will execute any documents necessary to fix any defects in the grantee's title.
I just need more points, I’m so sorry
Answer:
Row D
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws <u>establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional</u>. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States <u>protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction</u>.
