1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
docker41 [41]
4 years ago
10

I NEED HELP ASAP!!!!

History
2 answers:
alukav5142 [94]4 years ago
5 0

Answering the question, although there is no image attached in the question but I think the correct answer is it could help them develop a better understanding of past ideas.

Comparing and contrasting different viewpoints will enrich the source analysis. Getting to know how the source is could assist historians to clearly understand the context in which the event took place.

The source of this historic event could also help historians to ask certain questions like the ideologies that supported the event to occur and the impact it has on the society.

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

In 1898, On February 15, the warship <em>USS Maine exploded </em>and sank Havana Harbor. This historic event took the lives of about 260 men on board. There were about 355 men on board when the battleship exploded and sank.

During this period, Cuban guerillas were fighting for the independence of Cuba from Spain. However, in 1898, a riot broke out in Havana and this prompted the United States, who was in support of Cuba to send the battleship to Havana.  

The battleship commanded by Captain Charles was sent by the United States to Havana as a show of strength.

Some of the important details of this historical event include

  • The battleship<em> USS Maine </em>arrived Havana on January 25, 1898.
  • The battleship exploded on January 15
  • There were about 355 men on board
  • About 260 men lost their lives
  • There was also no concrete evidence to back up the claim that it was Spanish that caused the explosion

Learn more about USS Maine at:

brainly.com/question/10353527

#learnwithbrainly

yawa3891 [41]4 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is B) It could help them develop a better understanding of past ideas.

A new point of view help historians to understand this report in that it could help them develop a better understanding of past ideas.

As new research is done about with historical topic, new or different information can be found that serve historians to compare the official version of the story with the new evidence. This, of course, can change history because new evidence can explain interrogations of the past. That is why it is so important for historians to keep asking questions and develop different angles. For this to happen, they have to be open to hear or see different versions or even opposing versions of what official history has recorded.

You might be interested in
I'm the early 1800s, at the time the Missouri territory requested statehood, a.) there were more slaves states than free states
Stella [2.4K]

D would be the answer to this

4 0
3 years ago
the Kansas Divided Antislavery and ____________ groups rushed supporters to _______________ March 1855 , almost ______________pr
Aloiza [94]

The Kansas Divided Antislavery and <u>proslavery</u> groups rushed supporters to <u>first territorial legislature election</u> March 1855 , almost  <u>more than thousands</u> pro - slaver voters crossed from <u>Missouri</u> and voted in <u>Kansas</u>

<u>Explanation:</u>

There were rival governments in Kansas in 1855 that divided the people into pro slavery Missourians and antislavery groups. These Missourians also called themselves as Border Ruffians.

In March 1855, the first territorial election in Kansas is held. This election's result is the key to decide that Kansan would be a free or slaved state. More than thousand of border ruffians crossed the border of Missouri to Kansas to show their support to the pro-slavery candidates in the election.

They voted by defrauding to their supporters, even the governor of Kansas left it unnoticed to avoid bloodshed. As the result out of 39 seats, 37 seats were won by the pro slavery supporting candidates.

3 0
3 years ago
How did Liu Bang's methods of ruling the empire differ from the methods used by the Qin Dynasty?
Pavlova-9 [17]

The answer is: A.) He was more lenient and was guided by Confucian ideals.

  • Unlike the government methods used by Qin, which included harsh punishment for those who disagreed with him to the extent to which an individual could be put to death simply by suggesting another way to do things, the methods used by Liu Bang included the <u>abolition of the harsh law of the Qin Dynasty</u> and establishing a new one that was supported by the people. Liu took a series of measures that were <u>good for his people</u> as well, such as the reduction of field taxes levied on the peasants.
  • Another difference is that, while Qin was a legalist (basically someone who believes that people are bad so it is necessary to control every minute of their lives), Liu Bang promoted Confucianism as the dominant political ideology, in which it is believed that a good government should rule by virtue and moral example rather than by punishment or force.

Regarding the other options:

  • Option B.) He banned books and executed scholars who protested: Qin, and not Liu Bang, banned Confucianism along with all other schools that were against his own ideals. Freedom of speech was banned, and Quin ordered the burning of the books that critized him along with people that did so.
  • C.) He divided up the power among several states: Qin, and once again not Bang, divided his empire into 36 provinces. Each had two government officials in charge of it. He implemented this measure so that he could control every citizen.
  • D.) He banned all trade with cultures outside of China: China's natural barriers in the east, south, and west, protected her from invasion. But Qin wanted to reinforce China's protection from the Mongol tribe to the north. Therefore, Qin ordered his people to build The Great Wall, so the people couldn't trade with foreign cultures either.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best describes the period known as the old kingdom
nadezda [96]
<span>The correct answer is it was a time of dynastic uncertainty. What this means is that in the old kingdom the ruling dynasties kept changing all the time as a result of things like wars, power struggles, coups, and similar things. That's why many ruling dynasties switched before one was established and was for a while.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What 2 big events did George w Bush go through during his presidency
Artemon [7]

He went through the terrorist attacks of 9/11, and helped change the government for the better (department of homeland security)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the manhattan project help to end the war? answers?
    14·2 answers
  • What enabled India to make contact with the outside world in the sixth century B.C.E.?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the federal government help soldiers after World War II?
    5·1 answer
  • HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PLZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Where is Northern Ireland, England, Wales, and scotland
    14·1 answer
  • The government of Australia is both a and a A parliamentary democracy ... communist dictatorship B. federation ... territory C.
    11·1 answer
  • How to restate tins i will give u lots of points
    5·2 answers
  • Which event do you think was most significant in arriving at Confederation?
    12·1 answer
  • Early Florence Italy was known for its _____.<br><br> A.(wool<br> B.(wine<br> C.(strawberries
    8·2 answers
  • How did the growth of cities and commerce along with new theories of government lead to changes in social structure that affecte
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!