Answer:
B.R. Ambedkar
Explanation:
Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, the father of the Indian Constitution, was a harsh critic of Congress and its members, especially Mahatma Gandhi and Congress leaders whom he held accountable for the bad treatment that the Dalits were given in India. To B.R. Ambedkar was against the patronizing approach of Mahatma Gandhi toward the Dalits. He even wrote the book to openly criticize them in 1945. The reservation od the Schedule caste and scheduled tribe in the elections was the fruit of his hard work.
Chinese emperors turned their backs to the north and their imperial palaces traditionally faced south statement<em> </em>is true
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
Chinese Emperors were the ones to start a new dynasty. Referred to as the “The son of God”, they had a great power and responsibilities.
From the Qin dynasty to the Qing dynasty, there are 557 emperors including the rulers of minor states.
Palaces in China played an important role in the history of the imperial families and religion. One of the imperial palace is The Forbidden City. It is a palace complex in central Beijing, China. It houses the Palace Museum, and it was the former Chinese imperial palace from the Ming dynasty to the end of the Qing dynasty (the years 1420 to 1912).
The imperial symbol includes yellow clothes. The symbol of Dragon and Phoenix is to express their Emperors and Empress. It shows that they were strong and determined and rise from the fire
Strange forms of legal punishments were given by them in Early China.
They are known together as the "Five Mutilation":
- 1. Executing the person involved in crime activities
- 2. Castration
- 3. Chopping one's foot
- 4. Chopping one's nose
- 5. Tatooing
Learn more about the emperor brainly.com/question/13151010
#LearnWithBrainly
Hey there,
Your question states: What do you conclude about the weight problem in america? Based on my research, I believe that your correct answer would be <span>The overweight problem in the adult American population isn't as bad as the underweight problem.</span> It's been recorded that many of adults fall in that category on the obese or the heavy weight problems.
Hope this helps
A cultural system creates a unique world that is experienced as "reality" by its members. The people of a certain culture come to accept the "realities" which form its culture.
However, when groups of different cultures come together, their "realities" become confronted. Creating a clash of cultures. The outcome of this clash is decided by the material power of each of this groups. The group with the most material will emerge victoriously and end up influencing the other group with its cultural system. Therefore, individuals from the influenced culture will end up learning a new "reality" by force. On the other hand, individuals of the influencing culture tend to see the others as "objects of study".
Clashes of cultures have been occurring throughout time, affecting the cultural authenticity of groups. Due to the constant blend of cultures, it is nowadays, very difficult to consider that a certain cultural group is "truly authentic".
Answer:
Multiple causes took place that eventually caused many colonists to go against Great Britain.
Explanation:
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, there were many causes that continued to pile up. Parliament had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists didn't like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war.
Most colonists disagreed. Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.