The conservatives believe that conservatism can make them be closer to God and the truth which makes them have better decisions. It puts them to a higher plane to focus on the spiritual rather than materials things that are set by the world.
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
A. - yes, you need to feed the empire!
B. - yes, you need to defend the empire!
C. - yes, you need to govern the empire!
D. - no, this would actually be detrimental to the empire, revolts would be rather bad than good for it.
The Cross of Gold discourse was a discourse conveyed by William Jennings Bryan at the 1896 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. The discourse pushed Bimetallism. At the time, the Democratic Party needed to institutionalize the estimation of the dollar to silver and contradicted pegging the estimation of the United States dollar to a best quality level. The expansion that would come about because of the silver standard would make it less demanding for agriculturists and different borrowers to pay off their obligations by expanding their income dollars. It would likewise turn around the collapse which the U.S. experienced from 1873-1896.
Answer:
aww, im sure they miss you too !
Explanation:
