Answer:
Hindsight bias
Explanation:
Most individuals usually seem to perceive that they have a clearer picture or better knowledge of an event after such incident or happening has occurred, prompting then to think that they had a good knowledge of the occurrence before it occurred than they actually do.
For instance, after so many incidents, eyewitnesses or other individuals usually claim they knew what happened would actually occur. Owing to the fact that the incident has actually occurred, they say their claim with much more swagger than than they usually do before the incident.
Answer:
C, I did the test with a question like this:)
Explanation:
Answer:
Abundant evidence demonstrates that roots bend in response to gravity due to a regulated movement of the plant hormone auxin known as polar auxin transport.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
The correct answer to this question is "<span>It is truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof."
</span>
The skulls of early human-like creatures were much larger in size than the skulls of modern-day humans. A historian most likely describe thisstatement by having it <span>truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof.</span>
It depends on the mindset and situation, odds are they won't be too excited at first. I was happy though.
