<span>Technically, Kyle lied to Patrick about the time at which he would punch him. However, there is no contract to prove that this was what was said on the phone (heresay). Additionally, it does not mention that there was any sort of agreement or consideration made between the two of them regarding this. And even if there was, there might be a legality issue due to the fact that punching is both assault and battery when committed on a person, so the contract may not even be enforceable.
In terms of civil torts, Kyle didn't really commit anything that is pursuable in court, but did commit battery and assault. If Patrick fell or hit his head further and was injured/killed, he would be liable for an involuntary action, of which would be manslaughter if Patrick died. He would also be able to be sued for wrongful death by Patrick's family.</span>
Answer:
Jun's pressure and influence has invalidated Mika's consent.
Explanation:
By threatening Mika with prosecution if she doesn't set a discount for the sale of her house on the grounds of her debt to her, she has influenced Jun's consent or rather coerced it and therefore Mika's consent is invalidated in the agreement. Consent is free under law if contract and should be given under undue influence, duress or any other vitiating factor that will render the contract null and void such as the example above
Answer:
d. Accounts payable and accruals are tied directly to sales.
Explanation:
Additional funds needed method determines the amount that the company needs to finance the increase in total sales.
In response to the increase in sales, the company has to increase its assets to achieve that goal. The increase in total assets is partly offset by an increase in liabilities and the other part is offset by an increase in retained earnings.
The only true statement of the AFN equation is the option d), and the other options are not right.
Answer:
The answer is True.
Explanation:
From the description, it seems that World Extraction Corp is behaving in a socially responsible way – even though its stakeholders might not have the same view. Though in the long run, a company which behaves in socially responsible manner might accumulate enough goodwill from the society around it to be perceived with a good reputation, stakeholders who do not fit the company’s vision might end up being detrimental to the company’s business.
Answer:
The total economic cost is $40,500 per year
Explanation:
The total economic cost per year is equal to the sum of:
* The opportunity cost relating to sacrificing the current work Greg is working on which is equal to his yearly salary of : $40,00.
* The opportunity cost relating to sacrificing the interest income earned on $10,000 saving, which he is now used for purchasing equipment, which is calculated as: 10,000 * current rate of savings = 10,000* 5% = $500 ( total cost of equipment is not included because e could sell the equipment for what he paid later on).
=> So, total economic cost per year is $40,000 + $500 = $40,500.
