Which statement best demonstrates why the following is a non-example of a polynomial?
2 answers:
Answer:
(D)
Step-by-step explanation:
The given expression can be written as:
From this, it can be seen that the denominator of the given fraction consists of variables x and y and z which cannot be removed by simplifying the fraction due to which the given fraction cannot act as a polynomial as polynomial do not contain variables in the denominator if the fraction.
Thus, option D is correct that is The expression has a variable in the denominator of a fraction.
You might be interested in
So hmmm check the picture below
in an isosceles triangle, two sides are equal, and thus the angles those twin legs make, are also twin angles
let's say the angle made is "a", so all internal angles will be 64 + a + a = 180
or 64 + 2a = 180
thus 2a = 180 - 64 => 2a = 116, thus a = 116/2
in an isosceles triangle, two sides are equal, and thus the angles those twin legs make, are also twin angles
let's say the angle made is "a", so all internal angles will be 64 + a + a = 180
or 64 + 2a = 180
thus 2a = 180 - 64 => 2a = 116, thus a = 116/2