what sources of information are considered reliable according to the strict standards of scientific investigation?

Biology

1 answer:

garik1379 [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Peer-reviewed

Explanation:

If a scientific report is peer-reviewed it means that the contents of the report are corroborated by other scientists hence the veracity of the information is high and is very reliable. The best scientific reports clearly describe the experiments that were conducted to culminate to a particular scientific conclusion. The experiment is able to be replicated by another scientist and if the same results are achieved then the results are corroborated and the report positively reviewed.

You might be interested in

Which of the following best pairs Darwin's contributor to his ideas?

meriva

The man whose ideas most closely resemble the sentence would be Lyell - geological processes would take millions of years.

The reason is that neither of the other people in this case - Malthus, Lamarck or Hutton would be heard saying any of the mentioned things and only Lyell would be the man whose ideas were here the ones who are also true.

3 0

3 years ago

How many nitrogen bases are needed to specify 4 amino acids? a. 3 b. 6 c. 9 d. 12

lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer: Option D is correct (12).

Explanation:

Codon is a set of DNA or RNA nucleotides so each amino acids are coded by 3 bases. For the specification of 4 amino acids, 12 bases are required. 3*4=12

6 0

3 years ago

Charles darwin developed the theory thay explains how new speicies develop based on evidence from many different kinds of scient

IceJOKER [234]

They were most likely Biologists

8 0

3 years ago

What is the energy in ATP used to make or do?

Anettt [7]

I think it’s F, c, and a.

4 0

3 years ago