Answer:
much <em>more </em>likely;
There is only one car dealership in a small town, giving the dealership the ability to influence the price of cars. - <em>Market power</em>
A person smoking in a restaurant emits second-hand smoke that harms other restaurant patrons. - <em>Externality</em>
Explanation:
<u>Property rights</u> are an incentive for individuals to create goods that are needed on the market. In other words, when a discrepancy between demand and supply occurs on a specific market, entities, businesses or individuals that create the goods are motivated to meet market needs through enforced property rights.
On the other hand, when there is a lack of property rights that regulate the market, <em>market failures</em> occur. Two common types of market failures include <em>market power</em> and <em>externalities</em>.
The car dealership example shows <u>market power</u> in practice, as the reigning company can dictate car prices.
The second example shows an externality, as there is evident influence (cost or benefit) on the third party, which they cannot change. People are affected (negatively) by smoke they did not create.
Answer:
The answer is 30%
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
Project A
Project A costs = $350
Cash flows =$250 and $250 (next 2 years)
Project B
Project B costs =$300
Cash flow = $300 and $100
Now what is the crossover rate for these projects.
Thus
Year Project A Project B A-B B-A
0 -350 -300 -50 50
1 250 300 -50 50
2 250 100 150 -150
IRR 27% 26% 30% 30%
So,
CF = CF1/(1+r)^1 + CF2/(1+r)^2
$-50 = $-50/(1+r)^1 + $150/(1+r)^2
r = 30%
CF = CF1/(1+r)^1 + CF2/(1+r)^2
$50 = $50/(1+r)^1 + $-150/(1+r)^2
r = 30%
Hence, the cross over rate for these project is 30%
Note:
IRR =Internal rate of return
CF =Cash flow
r = rate
Answer:
C) $201,760
Explanation:
To compute the amount of cash proceeds, we have to multiply the bonds face value with the issued price percentage.
Since only issue price is given, so we assume it is in percentage form because the number of shares is not given in the question. So, we assume this.
In mathematically,
Cash proceeds = Face value × 0.97
= $208,000 × 0.97
= $201,760
Same as with Canada which is where both my grandfathers came from. Let's see how many reasons I can come up with just off the top of my head and just for those two.
- They enjoyed the freedom of the First Amendment (speech, press, religion, assembly -- Canada has the same provision) that was not granted in the country they left. They never exercised those rights, I don't think, but their children and grandchildren did.
- They were free to raise their children so that they had the chance of being productive. My father was an MD, but he owed that piece of good fortune to his father. The country from which they came would never have allowed him to get all that education.
- They were able to eventually bring their wives and children with them. There was enough money to be made, even at jobs that didn't pay much, to bring them across the Atlantic.
- They were able, once the families were here, to turn their attention to bettering their conditions. They never became rich, but no one starved either. That's more than could be said about those relatives who didn't do as they did.
- They were free to travel. They didn't do that, but their children and especially their grandchildren did. That too was very limited where they came from.
- They had medical care and good medical care which was not given to just anyone where they came from.
