What was America's Response to the Holocaust before the War?
Americans paid attention and were <em>outraged </em>by the Nazi attacks through petitions where tens of thousands of Americans wrote, signed, and sent the documents to Washington. It tells that the American people had information on the persecution of the Jews in 1933. The Americans saw the early warning sign through Adolf Hitler, an authoritarian ruler who had spread an exclusionary and violent racist ideology that became the precursors to genocide. To protest, Americans showed up at rallies and boycotted German stores.
What could the US Have done differently?
Adolf Hitler paid close attention to the American media coverage and may have gone further, and faster, had he not read about the American people's disapproval. Fewer Jews may have gotten out of Germany, and America could have been less prepared to respond militarily. The rallies, petitions, and boycotts mattered a great deal with a network formed by like-minded Americans who in this period that later led some Americans to raise their voices even louder and take greater risks as Nazi persecutions of Jews worsened in Europe. There were warning signs on Hitler and Nazi Germany, weekly and the US would have acted. These signs included the targeting of Jews, communists, and other political opponents.
Civil, domestic, state, nationwide, ethnic, governmental
Answer:
In my opinion yes because of the fact that it took 4 to 5 years of us fighting each other. but they also did not do there because because if they did another attack like when they pushed up north they they mite of won the war.
Explanation:
The correct answer is A) There needs to be an actual dispute between parties
Advisory Opinions are opinions given by a court that advises on the constitutionality or interpretation of the law. In the United States, federal courts and some states courts are not allowed to issue advisory opinions because it may appear to be a violation of the separation-of-powers doctrine.
The judicial branch exists to solve legal disputes and they need to do it by interpreting and applying the existing law.
Because of this, courts are only allowed to give advisory opinions when an actual dispute exists before the Court. This is called the “case or controversy” requirement.
