The answer is B because it makes sense
<span>One strategy Keith should not implement is to
"</span>
allow his child to watch repeated news
footage of the tragedy".
It is common in present day media that
they keep repeating the painful and tragic images as well as videos of an event
which may bring back the stressful and traumatic memories one has gone through
and for a child this can be devastating and leaving a permanent scar on the
personality.
Answer:
Social media has not only changing the ways people communication, it also has ability to redistribute the power, especially among governments and citizens. Nowadays, with the development of social networking, the power of changing the world is not only the leaders, according to a study from HAVAS GLOBAL COMMS (2013), the single greatest “agent of change” is “the people, empowered by social media”. Social media effect on political sphere by shifting who controls the information, how to distribute that information and how it be changed.
Before the social media era, people are just passive accept the information from government, their opinions are not easy to express. In the traditional media world, it only can use mass media as the way to carry out one-to-many information. Corporations, governments or other groups controlled the information conveyed with laws or sometimes “simply by owning the means of distribution” (Bennett, 2011). The owner of the information has the ability to control what the information is transmitted and how the information is framed.
I hope this helps! :)
In a market economy the production is determined not by someone's decision <em>(which can be wrong, and a wrong decision is the reason why there there are unwanted goods or a lack of wanted goods) </em>but it is regulated by the supply and demand: if there is a need for a good, it will be produced, and if there is no need for something, its production will halt and there will not be an unwanted storage.
In short, in a market economy, the economy itself regulates this.
