1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksano4ka [1.4K]
3 years ago
8

The case in which the Supreme Court heard a legal challenge to affirmative action programs was

History
2 answers:
andrey2020 [161]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The case in which the Supreme Court heard a legal challenge to affirmative action programs was Regents v. Bakke.

Explanation:

The School of Medicine of the University of California carried out a program by which sixteen students belonging to racial minorities had to be admitted for each class of one hundred students. With this aim it used a regular program according to which applicants were rejected with an average of less than 2.5 points and a special one in which that score did not apply, thus carrying out possitive action to include these minorities into higher education.

Allan P. Bakke, a white aspirant whose applications were rejected on two occasions, demanded the university because the special program had admitted candidates who had obtained a score lower than his. He founded his claim in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, that establishes that no State of the United States may deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of rights.

The Supreme Court of California considered that such a system was illegal and ordered the admission of the plaintiff. Once the documents have been sent to the Supreme Court of the United States, it partially confirmed the sentence: although admitting positive discrimination as a way to equalize opportunities and generate equity in cases where inequality is evident, this does not prevent that this type of measures must be equitable for all groups. Therefore, as this measure by the University of California generated injustices based on a positive action measure, it was declared unconstitutional and Bakke's admission was ordered.

saul85 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Confirmed: Regents v. Bakke

You might be interested in
Each particular crime, and it's components, defined is a part of what?
Elden [556K]
It is B i thank hmmmmm
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the job of the Committees of Correspondence?
VladimirAG [237]
<span>The job of the Committees of Correspondence </span>was to generate popular support for colonial resistance and weaken the authority of the British at the town level. A number of Committees of Correspondence were established throughout the original 13 colonies to create solidarity against what was considered as British tyranny.
6 0
3 years ago
Which position on the political spectrum is likely to support the claim of "peace through strength"?
chubhunter [2.5K]
'Peace through strength' is the idea that military power can secure peace. It is associated with conservative politics and was often used by the former U.S. President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. More recently it's been used by the current President Donald Trump.
7 0
3 years ago
2. Write a paragraph describing the allied<br> strategy used in the Pacific.
grandymaker [24]

Answer:

The truism surrounding the Pearl Harbor tragedy is that the US was provided with the destruction of the battleship fleet. Navy with a wake-up call putting it on the Pacific path to victory. Like all such popular beliefs, there is a grain of truth in it, but there is also considerable misunderstanding of the hard processes that the U.S. military, and especially the navy, had to go through before they were fully prepared to fight and prepared to deal with the Imperial Japanese Navy on a relatively equal basis. Pearl Harbor was, in fact, just the opening round of a series of crises that molded and influenced both American strategy and conflict itself. It is then the intention of this paper to investigate American naval and military strategy during the first ten months of the war and gain insight into what actually happened and how the services, particularly the navy, were transformed from a peacetime force with a peacetime bureaucratic culture into the amazing instrument they were to become by the summer of 1943. The crucial point on which this paper will focus will be the reciprocal strategic influence and operations on American strategic leadership at the sharp end of the fight against Japanese forces during the first 11 months of the Pacific War – a period that laid the foundation for the eventual American triumphs of 1943 and 1944.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What led to disunity among Mexico
mart [117]

Answer:

The result of the Mexican American War was the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, which stated that Mexico had to give up land to the United States, including Texas. That land now makes up the states of California, Utah and Nevada, as well as parts of Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico and Arizona. The treaty also established the national border of Mexico at the Rio Grande River.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which describes the Northwest Indians? A. lived in cliffside caves or cliff dwellings B. made their homes on mounds where they b
    10·1 answer
  • What was the terrorist’s main goal in committing the September 11, 2001, attacks?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Hammurabi have his laws engraved in stone and placed in a public place
    5·1 answer
  • Vatican City, a city-state that is ruled by a representative from the city-state's primary religious group, has which of the fol
    12·1 answer
  • How did many smaller medieval African societies organize themselves and build unity among communities
    11·1 answer
  • Why did government officials allow monopolies to operate without strong regulations during the Gilded Age?
    13·2 answers
  • What do you do when you enlist
    8·2 answers
  • Where was the Mughal Empire located?
    13·2 answers
  • Who good in history and can help me with #1 &amp; #2? Free Brainliest and points...
    7·2 answers
  • The Supreme Court CANNOT rule a law unconstitutional if it has been approved by the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!