The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
Answer:
to complete figures that are incomplete
Explanation:
They should only do that if they can't make better food. If they did, there would be no need to order junk food.
Life is what you make it.
We are human. We are made up of a lot of things.
That depends on what you believe in.
Drinking water in the community means that many people would dispose of waste in a bad way, they would create more pollution which is bad for the marine life, etc.
I think they could be solved if everyone could just follow the guidelines by recycling or doing good for the earth.