B. Calculating the cost of time, energy, and sacrifice.
The decision of this case is going to be done through the use of the strict liability tort.
<h3>What is the strict liability tort?</h3>
This is the tort that makes a person to be resonsible for all damages or loss that may have happened due to their actions. This is regardless of culpability.
Even though the use of the pesticides was not aimed at destroying the neighbors beehives, it did. Therefore, Mattingly's actions has caused damages for his neigbors. He has to pay for damages.
Read more on the strict reliability tort here: brainly.com/question/14927068
Answer:
Rebecca should evaluate the claim with her logic and reason, because all arguments in order to be valid shoud be support by both: logic and facts or evidence.
Explanation:
If the claim for instance is not built with logical reasoning, even if the facts of the claim have scientific evidence that support the claim, it should still be evaluated.
She should also analyze the reasons for the claim, to see if it is valid to claim about.
Answer:
Explanation:
In my opinion the answer should be time
1. Veto
2. threat of veto
3.item veto
4. special sessions
5. bargaining
6.pre session bargaining
7. message power
8. fact finding commisions
