<h2><u>
Answer:</u></h2><h3>The Line Plot is Below.</h3><h2><u>
</u></h2><h2><u>
Solution Steps:</u></h2>
______________________________
<h3>1.) Turn each fraction into a decimal:</h3>
<h3>2.) Then draw the line plot:</h3>
(I've included the line plot below.)
______________________________
<span>given:
increase in inventories= $13
increase in accounts receivable =$29
increase in accounts payable=$17
solution:
change in net working capital = increase in inventories + increase in accounts receivable - increase in accounts payable.
change in net working capital = 13+29-17 = $25</span>
Answer:
x = 2.75
Step-by-step explanation:
The goal here is to isolate the variable, or to get x by itself. We can do this by using simple math. The first step is to move every thing to the opposite side of x. We do this by subtracting 38 from 60, which leaves us with 22. Now we want divide 22 by 8. After doing this we are left with the equation x = 2.75. I know that at first fractions and decimals seem annoying and they feel like a lot of work. But if you take a second to really look at them, you will realize they are not that bad. As in most cases with math, looks can be deceiving
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim to be tested is:
The mean respiration rate (in breaths per minute) of students in a large statistics class is less than 32.
To test this claim the hypothesis can be defined as follows:
<em>H₀</em>: The mean respiration rate of students is 32, i.e. <em>μ</em> = 32.
<em>Hₐ</em>: The mean respiration rate of students is less than 32, i.e. <em>μ</em> < 32.
The sample mean respiration rate of students is 31.3.
According to the claim the sample mean is less than 32.
The sample mean value is not unusual if the claim is true, and the sample mean value is also not unusual if the claim is false.
Thus, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
