The correct answer would be, Criterion Variable.
College officials know that there is a good relationship between scores on the SAT and the success in college. In this situation, success in college is the Criterion Variable.
Explanation:
Criterion Variable is commonly known as the dependent variable. There are two types of variables used in research processes, one is Dependent and the other is Independent. A dependent variable is the one which is dependent upon the results of the independent variable.
So in the given scenario, college officials know that there is a good relationship between SAT scores and College success. In this situation, SAT score is the independent variable, whereas the College success is the dependent variable, which means that if a student gets good score in SAT, he will surely perform good in the college.
Learn more about the Dependent and Independent Variables at:
brainly.com/question/11719274
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer:
A price floor set above the market equilibrium price has several side-effects. Consumers find they must now pay a higher price for the same product. As a result, they reduce their purchases or drop out of the market entirely. Meanwhile, suppliers find they are guaranteed a new, higher price than they were charging before.
Explanation:
Answer:
Negotiate a higher travel fee for the next assignment in that area
Explanation:
A signing agent is a person who should ensure remain objective, neutral to any position.
So, in this case, the best option is to negotiate a higher travel fee for the next assignment in that area taking into account that it wasn't analyzed this before the transaction mentioned.
